NiCad Batteries
Contents:
- 1.
Introduction
- 1.1) About the
Author
- 1.2) Legal
Stuff and Disclaimer
- 1.3) Credo #1:
Charge control is the key to battery management
- 2.
Let the Rambling begin!
- 2.1) How does
a Ni-Cd battery work?
- 2.2) OK, so
what happens when cells are charged?
- 2.3) OK, so
what's so tricky?
- 2.4) OK, so it
looks like batteries are well protected. Now what?
- 2.5) Credo #2:
Heat is the enemy of batteries
- 2.6) What are
battery manufacturers doing to prevent damage from overcharging?
- 2.7) How about
those high-temp batteries?
- 2.8) What
about those super-high capacity cells?
- 2.9) Does the
memory effect exist?
- 2.10) Summary
- 2.11) OK, so I
need to "properly" charge cells. How do I do that?
- 2.12) I've
seen terminology like "C/n" where n is a number. What gives?
- 2.13) So,
what's the right charge current?
- 2.14) You
mentioned cell reversal. What is that, and why is it so bad?
- 2.15) Credo
#3: Take care of your cells, and they will take care of you
- 2.16) OK, my
cells died. I was nice to them, what happened?
- 2.17) I've
seen people talk about zapping cells to revive them
- 2.18) How
about self-discharge?
- 2.19) What
about NiMH cells?
- 2.20) What if
I want to learn even more about NiCds and other batteries?
- 3.
General Electric's tech. note regarding memory, by Bob Myers KC0EW
- 4.
More on NiCd dealings, by Paul Timmerman
- 4.1) About the
Author
-
4.2) NiCd 'memory' and more
[Document Version: 1.02] [Last Updated:
8/20/96]
Some Ramblings About NiCd
Batteries
Author: Ken A. Nishimura (KO6AF)
E-Mail:
kennish@kabuki.EECS.Berkeley.EDU
I have decided to write this diatribe due to the continuing Ni-Cd battery saga.
Yes, batteries are LOW tech -- they can't compare to the bells and whistles of
our latest HTs, but... your new HT is but a paperweight (albeit an expensive
one) without power from your batteries. This is not a response to any particular
prior post, and is unsolicited, so in short, I'm not flaming anyone.... But, I
thought it may be useful, so, without further ado, let us take a more careful
look into NiCd battery management.
Note:
- The stuff below glosses over some of the
more technical nitty gritty details. I wanted it to be shorter than 50K
Bytes!
- I actively solicit corrections (at
kennish@kabuki.EECS.Berkeley.EDU), both technical and editorial.
If you have information contrary to that presented below, please let me
know. Flames, on the other hand, are summarily disregarded, as usual.
Panasonic, Sanyo,
and Millennium are registered trademarks of their respective holders. This
document is not intended to promote a particular manufacturer or product.
Material contain herein is believed to be correct, but the author cannot be held
responsible for error, either editorial or material contained within. Use of the
information above is at the sole risk of the reader. Permission granted to use
any of the material above, provided this disclaimer is preserved in its
entirety.
More batteries are destroyed or damaged by bad charging techniques than all
other causes combined. Once a battery reaches full charge, the charging current
has to go somewhere -- most often, generating heat and gases. Both are bad for
batteries.
Let us answer this with another question. How does a electrochemical cell work?
First, a bit of nomenclature. A cell is a
single electrochemical device with a single anode and a single cathode. A
battery is a collection of cells, usually connected in series to obtain a higher
terminal voltage.
Batteries, whether they are primary (use once)
or secondary (rechargeable) are devices which convert chemical energy into
electrical energy. In the case of the latter, they can take electrical energy
and store it as chemical energy for later use.
The key to electrochemistry are the processes
of oxidation and reduction. Remember the phrase" "LEO (the lion) goes GER
(grr??)
LEO = Lose
Electrons Oxidation GER =
Gain Electrons Reduction.
When one oxidizes a material, it gives up
electrons it becomes more positively charged, or enters a higher oxidation
state. Likewise, when one reduces a material, one is adding electrons to it and
either making it negatively charged or reducing its oxidation state.
Now, one can make a cell using two materials,
say A and B and immersing them in a solution which can conduct ions, called an
electrolyte. (An ion is a charged atom or radical of a molecule capable of
transferring electrical charge). Now, let us say that material A is easily
oxidized -- it likes to lose electrons, while B is a material that likes to be
reduced. When these two materials are immersed in an electrolyte, and a circuit
is completed from A to B, A is oxidized and electrons are released to flow to
the circuit. After performing electrical work, the electrons flow into B, where
B is reduced. The circuit from B to A is completed by the flow of ions in the
electrolyte. A secondary cell can be reversed by forcing electrons into A, and
reducing the oxidized A to regain unoxidized A for use again.
This, of course, is an oversimplified view, as
only certain combinations of materials and electrolytes provides useful and
practical batteries.
Oh, one more bit of nomenclature: The cathode
is where reduction takes place, and the anode is where oxidation takes place.
So, in a battery which is producing current, the positive terminal is the
cathode, and the negative terminal is the anode. Yes, this is counterintuitive
from our understanding of diodes, where the cathode is negative with respect to
the anode...
Now, the NiCd system itself:
When the cell is fully charged:
The cathode is composed of Nickelic Hydroxide.
Now, nickel is one of those elements that has
multiple oxidation states -- it can lose a different number of electrons per
atom, depending on how hard it is coerced. Nickel is usually found with
oxidation states of 0 (free metal), +2, +3 and +4. The +2 state is referred with
a -ous suffix, while the +3 and +4 states are referred with a -ic suffix. So,
nickelic hydroxide is really NiOOH (the nickel has a charge of +3) or
Ni(OH) (the nickel has a charge of +4)
4
The anode is composed of free
cadmium metal (zero oxidation).
The electrolyte is usually a solution of
potassium hydroxide (KOH).
When one connects a load to the cell, as
explained earlier, the anode is oxidized and the cathode is reduced. Electrons
leave the anode where the cadmium is oxidized and forms:
Cd(OH) , plus 2 free electrons.
2
These two electrons go to the
cathode where they reduce the nickelIC hydroxide to form nickelOUS hydroxide or:
Ni(OH) (where the nickel has
2
a charge of +2)
This reaction can take place until the
materials are exhausted. In theory, cells are manufactured so that both anode
and cathode are spent at roughly equal rates.
Well, in a nutshell, the inverse of the discharge. To charge, one is forcing
current back into the cell (opposite of discharge current). Here, electrons are
being taken out of the positive terminal, and forced into the negative terminal.
This means that the material at the positive terminal is being oxidized (hence
is now the anode -- confusing, eh?) and material at the negative terminal is
being reduced (now the cathode).
In the NiCd system, the cadmium hydroxide is
being re-converted into cadmium, and the nickelous hydroxide is being
re-converted to nickelic hydroxide.
Note that the electrolyte in both charge and
discharge is a means to move the hydroxyl (OH-) ions around. Unlike the
lead-acid system, the electrolyte really doesn't change in composition too much
between the charged and discharged state.
The easy part of
charging is reconverting the spent material on the plates to the charged
condition. The hard part is knowing when to stop. Let us take a moment to think
about what happens when we overcharge the battery. Once all the nickelous
hydroxide is converted into nickelic hydroxide, and in theory all the cadmium
hydroxide is converted into cadmium, the charging current has to go somewhere.
As the energy of the charging current cannot go into more chemical energy, it
goes into splitting water (water is still the major constituent of the
electrolyte). Just like the age old chemistry experiment of splitting water into
hydrogen and oxygen, a fully charged NiCd cell does the same thing. You are
forcing oxidation at the positive terminal and reduction at the negative. When
one oxidizes water (actually the OH-) ion, one produces oxygen. Likewise, at the
negative terminal (now the cathode), one produces hydrogen.
This of course is bad. Oxygen + hydrogen =
BOOM. Cell manufacturers, or at least their lawyers, frown on this from
happening. So, they cheat. During manufacture, they deliberately oversize the
negative plate, and they partially discharge it. That is, they put a fully
charged positive plate, but put a slightly discharged, but bigger plate of
cadmium in. The amount of free cadmium in the oversized plate is matched to
discharge in step with the amount of nickelic hydroxide provided in the positive
plate.
Now consider what happens as full charge is
achieved. Oxidation of water starts at the anode, but since the cathode is
oversized, and has excess hydroxide, the current continues to produce cadmium
metal instead of hydrogen. At the same time, the separator (the material used to
prevent the plates from shorting) is designed to allow oxygen gas to diffuse
through, from the positive to the negative plate. The free oxygen then oxidizes
the cadmium metal to form more cadmium hydroxide to prevent hydrogen from being
formed. Voila -- a safe battery.
Not so fast..... this scheme will work only as long as the overcharging current
is limited to a value such that the rate of oxygen liberation at the anode is
less than or equal to the rate of diffusion across the separator. If the
overcharging current is too high, excess oxygen is produced at the anode, and
since not enough oxygen can diffuse across to make up for the reduction at the
cathode, the excess cadmium hydroxide is used up. Then, hydrogen is formed. This
leads to a dangerous situation, due to both fire and overpressure. Cells are
designed to vent when this condition occurs, releasing the excess hydrogen and
oxygen to the air before really bad things happen. While this may keep one's
cells from blowing up, it does damage them, since one is losing material from
one's cell. As one loses water, it upsets the chemical balance inside the cell
-- lose enough water, and it stops working.
Another problem is that the process of
generating oxygen, and recombining it at the cathode generates heat. With a
moderate amount of current, the cell temperature can rise considerably, to 50 or
60 degrees C. If after charging, the batteries are hot, then you have
overcharged them -- slap yourself on your wrist...
A NiCd
stored, used, or charged under high temperature conditions will die an early
death. Heat causes the separator to weaken, the seals to weaken, and greatly
accelerates changes in the plate material, some of which cause the dreaded
memory effect.
So even though the cells may not vent, the
heat by-product is wearing down the cells. Specifically, hydrolysis or
degradation of the separator material, usually polyamide, is greatly accelerated
at high temperatures. This leads to premature cell failure (see below).
Quite a lot. The demand for rapid charging has lead to a great increase in
overcharging abuse. Most all NiCd cells can be rapid charged. The trick is to
stop charging when it is fully charged. The so called "rapid charge" type of
cells just incorporate protection against overcharging at high currents. Most
often, this is done with activated carbon inserted in the cell to promote the
collection of oxygen and to deliver it to the cathode for recombination. By
increasing the rate of oxygen transport, one is increasing the ability of the
cell to resist venting. Note however, that heat is still generated.
The price one pays for this is reduced
capacity. Everything takes space in the cell, and space for carbon means less
space for active material. Also, there have been some indications that carbon
can cause the cadmium metal to corrode, possibly leading to a shorter life.
There
are ways to make NiCd cells more resistant to the damaging effects of heat.
Mainly, using polypropylene separators and changing the electrolyte to sodium
hydroxide makes the cells more durable under high temperatures. However, the
cost is higher, and the internal resistance is raised, making high current
discharge more difficult. Unless one knows that cells will be used at high
temperatures, don't bother -- learn to take care of the cells to avoid
overheating them.
Yup, the manufacturers are in a numbers game. It used to be that AA cells were
450 mAh. Then came 500, then 600 mAh. Now, 700, 800 and even 900 mAh cells are
available. Next year, Sanyo will introduce a 950 mAh cell. OK, so what's going
on? Well, the highest capacity cells use foamy or spongy backing material for
their plates. This allows packing more active material into the plates, but the
cost is higher resistance. Recall that one of the great virtues of NiCds is
their low internal resistance -- this allows large discharge currents for
transmitting, for example.
So far, the highest capacity sintered plate
(best for low resistance) cell I have seen is the Sanyo KR-800 cell, rated at
800 mAh.
The Panasonic 900 mAh cell is of the foam
type, and may work for a specific application, but expect higher resistance. I
also suspect (but am not sure) that the Millenium cells are also foam type. For
most consumer applications, the internal resistance isn't an issue -- for high
power transmitting (e.g. more than 1A of current), it can be a concern.
<Flame
shields on> YES
Just as everyone is running around and saying
that the memory effect is a myth, here I am, saying that it is true. OK, so, why
is this? First of all, the
term memory effect is quite
unscientific. People tend to attribute any failure of a NiCd to
memory.
Let us define memory as the phenomenon where
the discharge voltage for a given load is lower than it should be. This can give
the appearance of a lowered capacity, while in reality, it is more accurate to
term it voltage depression.
Memory is also hard to reproduce, which makes
it hard to study. Originally, memory effect was seen in spacecraft batteries
subjected to a repeated discharge/charge cycle that was a fixed percentage of
total capacity (due to the earth's shadow). After many cycles, when called upon
to provide the full capacity, the battery failed to do so. Since we aren't in
space, the above is not really relevant...
Let us look at various causes of "memory" or
voltage depression.
Memory can be attributed to changes in the
negative or cadmium plate. Recall that charging involves converting
Cd(0H) to Cd metal.
2
Ordinarily, and under moderate
charging currents, the cadmium that is deposited is microcrystalline (i.e. very
small crystals). Now, metallurgical thermodynamics states that grain boundaries
(boundaries between the crystals) are high energy regions, and given time, the
tendency of metals is for the grains to coalesce and form larger crystals. This
is bad for the battery since it makes the cadmium harder to dissolve during high
current discharge, and leads to high internal resistance and voltage depression.
The trick to avoiding memory is avoiding
forming large crystal cadmium. Very slow charging is bad, as slow growth aids
large crystal growth (recall growing rock candy). High temperatures are bad,
since the nucleation and growth of crystals is exponentially driven by
temperature. The problem is that given time, one will get growth of cadmium
crystals, and thus, one needs to reform the material. Partial cycling of the
cells means that the material deep with the plate never gets reformed. This
leads to a growth of the crystals. By a proper execution of a discharge/charge
cycle, one destroys the large crystal cadmium and replace it with a
microcrystalline form best for discharge.
This does NOT mean that one
needs to cycle one's battery each time it is used. This does more harm
than good, and unless it is done on a per cell basis,
one risks reversing the cells and that really kills them.
Perhaps once in a while, use the pack until it is 90% discharged, or to a cell
voltage of 1.0V under light load. Here, about 95% of the cells capacity is used,
and for all intensive purposes, is discharged. At this point, recharge it
properly, and that's it.
The more common "memory effect" isn't memory
at all, but voltage depression caused by overcharging. Positive plate
electrochemistry is very complicated, but overcharging changes the crystal
structure of the nickelic hydroxide from beta-Nickelic Hydroxide to
gamma-Nickelic hydroxide. The electrochemical potential of the gamma form is
about 40 to 50 mV less than the beta form. This results in a lower discharge
voltage. In a six cell (7.2v) pack, this means a loss of 300 mV. Trick? Don't
overcharge. Leaving cells on a trickle charger encourages formation of gamma
nickelic hydroxide. Expect the cells to discharge at a lower voltage.
- DON'T
deliberately discharge the batteries to avoid memory
- DO
let the cells discharge to 1.0V/cell on occasion through normal use.
- DON'T
leave the cells on trickle charge for long times, unless voltage depression
can be tolerated.
- DO
protect the cells from high temperature both in charging and storage.
- DON'T
overcharge the cells. Use a good charging technique.
- DO
choose cells wisely. Sponge/foam plates will not tolerate high
charge/discharge currents as well as sintered plate.
There are many methods of charging. One is trickle or the old 15 hour method.
This involves using a current of about 50 mA (for AA cells) and leaving them on
charge for 15 hours. At this current level, oxygen diffusion is more than enough
to take care of the excess current once full charge is achieved. Of course, one
runs the risk of voltage depression due to overcharge.
The best method is the so called delta-V
method. If one plots the terminal voltage of the cell during a charge with a
constant voltage, it will continue to rise slowly as charging progresses. At the
point of full charge, the cell voltage will drop in a fairly short time. The
amount of drop is small, about 10 mV/cell, but is distinctive. There are
circuits out there built specifically to look for this. The Maxim MAX712 and 713
ICs are ones that come to mind now. This method is expensive and tedious, but
gives good reproducible results. There is a danger in this though. In a battery
with a bad cell this delta - V method may not work, and one may end up
destroying all the cells, so one needs to be careful. If one ends up putting in
more than double the charge capacity of the cell, then something is wrong.
Another cheap way is to measure the cell
temperature. The cell temperature will rise steeply as full charge is reached.
When the cell temperature rises to 10 degrees C or so above ambient, stop
charging, or go into trickle mode.
Whatever method one chooses, a failsafe timer
is a requirement with high charge currents. Don't let more than double the cell
capacity of charge current flow, just in case. (i.e. for a 800 mAh cell, no more
than 1600 mAh of charge).
This is a method of expressing current as a fraction of the Ah rating of a cell.
Simply, a 100 mA current means much more to a small N cell than to a large D
cell. So, rather than use absolute units of amperes, cell manufacturers often
use fractions of cell capacity, or C. A typical good AA cell has a capacity of
700 mAh, so C = 700 mA. A current of C/10 is therefore 70 mA, while C/2 is 350
mA.
Depends.
If using an unregulated charger -- one that doesn't do any detection of full
charge, then one must restrict your charge current to the overcharge capacity of
your cell. All NiCd cells I have seen can handle C/10 (approx. 50 mA for AA
cell) indefinitely without venting. This is not to say that one won't get
voltage depression, but rather that one won't destroy the cell(s).
If one wants to get a bit more aggressive, a
C/3 charge will recharge the cells in about 4 hours, and at this rate, most
cells will handle a bit of overcharge without too much trouble. That is, if one
catches the cells within an hour of full charge, things should be OK. No
overcharge is best of course.
Only with automatic means of full charge
detection should one use charge currents above C/2. At this current level and
above, many cells can be easily damaged by overcharging. Those that have oxygen
absorbers may not vent, but will still get quite hot.
With a good charge control circuit, charge
currents in excess of C have been used -- the problem here becomes reduced
charge efficiency and internal heating from ohmic losses. Unless one is in a
great hurry, avoid rates greater than C.
In a battery, not all cells are created equal. One will be weaker than the
others. So, as the battery is discharged, the weakest cell will use up all its
active material. Now, as discharge continues, the current through the dead cell
becomes a charging current, except that it is reversed. So, now reduction is
occurring at the positive terminal. As there is no more nickelic hydroxide, it
reduces the water, and produces hydrogen. Cell pressure builds, and it vents.
The cell has lost water and the life of the cell has been shortened
This is the big danger of
battery cycling to prevent memory. Invariably, unless one is very careful, one
ends up reversing a cell. It does much more harm than the cycling does good.
Also, keep in mind that cells to have a finite life. Each cycle is a bit of
life.
I have a set of cells from 1981 that are still working. Sintered plate, 450 mAh
old technology -- originally trickle charged, now rapid charged many times using
a delta-V technique.
All good things must come to an end. No matter how well one takes care of the
cells, they will eventually die. There are two main reasons cells fail, other
than abuse. One is separator failure, and the other is degradation of the active
material. The first is far more common, and the result is a shorted cell. Every
time a cell is charged, the active material is redeposited on the plates.
Ideally, this occurs uniformly across the surface of the plate.
However, in reality, there will be bumps and
valleys. When there are bumps on both the positive and negative plates are
adjacent, separated only by the separator, the resistance between those two
points is slightly less than in other regions of the cell. So, the current
density there rises. This means that more material is deposited there,
contributing to even more "bumpiness". In reality, needles called dendrites
form, and given time, they can force themselves through the separator to short
the cell.
A cell that appears to self-discharge in a
couple of days has dendrite problems, and will soon completely short out. Plan
to replace the cell.
Degradation of the active plate material is
just a normal aging process of cycling. Both of these mechanisms are very good
reasons to avoid cycling the cells after each use. Cells should live to about
1000 cycles if treated properly. Anything over that is gravy.
Yup -- a quick fix it. When cells short due to dendrites, the piece of material
that is actually shorting the cell is very thin. So, by forcing a huge impulse
of current into the cell, one can vaporize the dendrite -- sort of blowing a
fuse.
This works, and can revive an otherwise
shorted cell. However, it is a
stopgap measure at best. First, the fact that one dendrite has
formed means that another is not too far behind. Second, the material that was
vaporized has now permeated the separator material, forming a resistor that
shorts the plates. The cell may no longer be shorted, but will still have a poor
charge retention.
Besides, unless done properly, this can be
dangerous as large currents are necessary.
Yes, NiCds have a
bad habit of going dead when you just leave them. Fortunately you can recharge
them. The current cells discharge about 1 percent a day, maybe a bit less.
Expect them to be mostly flat after 3 months. Unfortunately, the so called 15
hour trickle chargers more than make up for self-discharge. In fact most of the
current goes to making oxygen, not making up for self-discharge. If you want to
make something to keep your cells from self-discharging, make a 1 to 2 mA
current source. That should more than overcome self-discharge.
NiMH or nickel
metal-hydride cells are a promising alternative to NiCds. They use hydrides
(metals capable of storing hydrogen) as the negative material in lieu of
cadmium. They have higher capacity for the same size cell, and don't use toxic
cadmium. They also are advertised as not suffering from memory.
The downside:
They are expensive (all new technology is). They have a horrible self-discharge
rate (I have measured between 3 to 10 percent per day -- useless after 1 month).
They are trickier to charge. Delta V works, but the voltage drop is very small
(2.5 mV/cell). Better to charge them to a point where the voltage stops rising.
And, yes, the same thing goes with hydrides as with cadmium. They can suffer
from memory, though it is much harder to see than in NiCds. Expect to see a bit
less touting of the "memory free" operation of NiMH cells in the future.
There are several good texts on batteries. One is quite new and contains fairly
contemporary material:
- Maintenance-Free Batteries by D. Berndt,
Research Studies Press, Ltd., Taunton, Somerset, England in
conjunction with J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1993. ISBN 0-86380-143-9.
From General Electric's tech. note regarding memory (posted without
permission and any errors are my own):
- "Among the many users of batteries in both
the industrial and consumer sectors, the idea of a memory phenomenon in
nickel-cadmium batteries has been widely misused and understood. The term
'memory' has become a catch-all 'buzzword' that is used to describe a raft
of application problems, being most often confused with simple voltage
depression.
To the well informed, however, 'memory' is a
term applied to a specific phenomenon encountered very infrequently
[emphasis mine - RLM] in field applications. Specifically, the term 'memory'
came from an aerospace nickel-cadmium application in which the cells were
repeatedly discharged to 25% of available capacity (plus or minus 1%) by
exacting computer control, then recharged to 100% capacity WITHOUT
OVERCHARGE [emphasis in the original]. This long term, repetitive
cycle regime, with no provisions for overcharge, resulted in a loss of
capacity beyond the 25% discharge point. Hence the birth of a "memory"
phenomenon, whereby nickel-cadmium batteries purportedly lose capacity if
repeatedly discharged to a specific level of capacity.
The 'memory' phenomenon observed in this
original aerospace application was eliminated by simply reprogramming the
computer to allow for overcharging. [Note that no mention is made of adding
an intentional *discharge* to clear the problem - RLM] In fact, 'memory' is
always a completely reversible condition; even in those rare cases where
'memory' cannot be avoided, it can easily be erased. Unfortunately, the idea
of memory-related loss of capacity has been with us since. Realistically,
however, 'memory' CANNOT exist if ANY ONE of the following
conditions holds:
- Batteries achieve full overcharge.
- Discharge is not exactly the same each
cycle - plus or minus 2-3%
- Discharge is to less than 1.0 volt per
cell.
Remember, the
existence of any ONE of these conditions eliminates the
possibility of 'memory'. GE has not verified true 'memory' in any field
application with the single exception of the satellite application noted
above. Lack of empirical evidence notwithstanding, 'memory' is still blamed
regularly for poor battery performance that is caused by a number of simple,
correctable application problems."
[End of quote from GE tech. note]
This note goes on to list the following as the
most common causes of application problems wrongly attributed to 'memory':
- Cutoff voltage too high
- basically, since NiCds have such a flat voltage vs. discharge
characteristic, using voltage sensing to determine when the battery is
nearly empty can be tricky; an improper setting coupled with a slight
voltage depression can cause many products to call a battery "dead" even
when nearly the full capacity remains usable (albeit at a slightly reduced
voltage).
- High temperature conditions
- NiCds suffer under high-temp conditions; such environments reduce both the
charge that will be accepted by the cells when charging, and the voltage
across the battery when charged (and the latter, of course, ties back into
the above problem).
- Voltage depression due to
long-term overcharge - Self-explanatory.
NiCds can drop 0.1-0.15 V/cell if exposed to a long-term (i.e., a period of
months) overcharge. Such an overcharge is not unheard-of in consumer gear,
esp. if the user gets in the habit of leaving the unit in a charger of
simplistic design (but which was intended to provide enough current for a
relatively rapid charge). As a precaution, I do NOT leave any of my NiCd
gear on a charger longer than the recommended time UNLESS the charger is
specifically designed for long-term "trickle charging", and explicitly
identified as such by the manufacturer.
- There are a number of other possible causes
listed in a "miscellaneous" category; these include -
- Operation below 0 deg. C
- High discharge rates (above 5C) in a
battery not specifically designed for such use
- Inadequate charging time or a defective
charger
- One or more defective or worn-out cells
(NiCds DO have a finite life; they won't keep charging and discharging
FOREVER no matter how well we baby them.)
To close with one more quote from the GE note:
- "To recap, we can say that true 'memory' is
exceedingly rare. When we see poor battery performance attributed to
'memory', it is almost always certain to be a correctable application
problem. Of the...problems noted above, Voltage Depression is the one most
often mistaken for 'memory'.....
Author: Paul Timmerman
Posted to: sci.chem.electrochem
E-Mail:
ptimmerm@mashtun.jpl.nasa.gov or
paul.j.timmerman@jpl.nasa.gov
This has been an interesting thread, but one which took some slightly wrong
turns. I hate to sound like a self proclaimed expert, but I will anyhow. NASA
has paid me for the last 5 years to study and model Nickel-Cadmium batteries.
Check out my battery modelling home page if you care to, at:
http://mashtun.jpl.nasa.gov/section342.html
[...] stated that the
"memory" effect was not caused by shallow discharges, but by poor charging
practices. Well, this is correct in that most commercial apps have cheap
constant current chargers, and people forget to unplug them. However, with the
most sophisticated chargers, and repetitive cycling, a noticeable voltage
plateau does indeed developed, and it occurs at both electrodes. (I have the
data) The cadmium electrode is said to develop a cadmium/nickel alloy with a
smaller reversible potential. The positive electrode is more complex. The
formation of the higher valence Ni+3 (gamma) phase material seems to produce
marked semiconductor phenomenon, which can lead to depletion of the charge
carrier (holes?). In this case the positive electrode potential can drop down to
the reversible potential for oxygen. If this happens any oxygen in the cell, it
can recombine electrochemically at the positive, creating a mixed potential
which is seen as such a plateau. Both oxygen build up and gamma phase acculation
are often the result of overcharging, but will happen too with "good" charging
practices, but more slowly.
Getting back to the original question, is
reconditioning useful. The answer is definitely a yes, but marginally. If you
were to completely discharge your cells every time you used them, you would
dramatically shorten their lives. If however, you need max capacity and have the
$$ for new cells, go for it. I would recommend a recondition once every three
months for most applications. Too much hassle? then don't do it and buy new
packs sooner.
Recondition should be done to 1.0 volts per
cell or there abouts, if no individual cell let down resistors are present. The
strong cells tend to drive the weak into reversal, generating hydrogen and
causing some permanent damage to the cell, although the hydrogen will eventually
recombine. Lots of hydrogen is a dangerous thing. If you feel must go lower, you
should switch to a low rate resistor for the last bit. With individual cell
monitoring you could go all the way to 0.0 v theoretically, but that never
happens.
But I prefer to run my packs to various
depths, and get a mild "stealth" reconditioning that way. This reduces the total
number of cycles on the pack and should help prolong the useful life.
I was stated that with modern Ni-Cd's rigorous
battery charge control was nearly superfluous. I couldn't disagree more. The
trend for rechargeable applications is to push them harder and harder, with
expectations of greater cycle life, faster recharge, better voltage regulation,
and more temperature tolerance. The basic commercial design has not changed very
much, although some manufacturers are doing a very good job in tuning their
production to give consistent cells. The desire for 15 minute chargers is very
real, and you need special equipment to do it.
Pulse charging is a hot topic that allot of
people are trying stake out patents. There seems to be some advantage at the
highest rates 15 -30 minute charging to this technique for nicds. The Cristie
charger was designed for Lead-Acid systems, where liquid phase stratification
was a big problem. It is quite helpful in "stirring" the acid in the big cells
they typically market. There is also some evidence that the pulse charging
changes the morphology of the cadmium electrode, in an advantageous way. High
rates and current reversals tend to give higher areas and better utilization.
This is good, especially for cheap plastic roll bonded cadmium electrodes found
in your average commercial cell.
The comments about storage shorted or trickle
charged is right on. What wasn't said is the benefits of keeping them in the
fridge or freezer. Keep them above -20f and you'll be sure not to freeze the
electrolyte.
Jonathon was asking about bubbles and charging
and heat. It sounds like you got some sales literature thrown at you. The
bubbles are oxygen, and you don't shake them loose, you electro- chemically
recombine them. Bill, they are generated at the Nickel electrode. The real
solution is to not make so many of them. You do that by controlling the cell
potential, and thus the driving potential on the positive electrode. Pulsing may
do that by relaxing the proton diffusion gradients in the positive electrode, or
it may not! Like I said, at high rates, good idea. The effect on dead cells can
be to burn out the cadmium shorts and give you a few more cycles. Jon, I could
tell you what to look for but then I'd have to kill ya! :-)
The circuit that Gerald posted seems to be
working off 60 hz AC. I am not sure, but I think that is a little fast for
optimal results. (So move to Europe 50 hz :-) The problem is that at two high a
frequency you just access the double layer capacitance in the cell and you don't
exercise the main reactions, or the overcharge ones. I seem to remember 15 hz as
being indicated by the work of McBreen on the Zinc electrode.
|